🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear the manager could survive a loss to Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, squandering the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Regarding System & Ideology

For example, it was the director , after having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

The Ultimate Power In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach of play “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Order: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to join a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, yet finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or fails of the box.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged whereas the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later discard him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.